,واکاوی انتقادی داستان انگیزه تألیف کتاب فصل الخطابِ محدث نوری (با تأکید بر نقل آیت الله محمد صادقی تهرانی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

محقق و پژوهشگر ، و دانش آموخته علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه قرآن و حدیث.قم .ایران. .

10.30484/jii.2023.3136.1082

چکیده

مناقشه‌آمیزترین کتاب شیعی، که احتمال حذف و تغییر در مصحف عثمانى را صحیح دانسته، کتاب فَصْل‌الخطاب میرزا حسین نوری است. آثاری که در واکنش یا رد این اثر، میانه سال تألیف کتاب تا وفات محدث نوری، نگارش یافته‌اند، ناچیز هستند؛ اما در دورۀ معاصر، آثار بسیاری به فصل‌الخطاب پرداخته‌اند. در این میان، در برخی از این آثار، ادعاها و داستان‌های نیز پیرامون محدث نوری و کتاب او، به چشم می‌خورد؛ که باعث شماتت و نقدهای تندی پیرامون شخصیت علمی حاجی نوری شده است. یکی از این داستان‌ها، داستان انگیزه تألیف فصل الخطاب است؛ که گفته شده محدث نوری، فریب دولت انگلستان را، برای ضربه زدن به اسلام، خورده است؛ و کتاب فصل‌الخطاب به تحریک کارمند سفارت انگلیس نوشته شده است. این داستان، توسط آیت الله مرعشی نجفی به نقل از سردار کابلی، و توسط چند نفر از آیات عظام معاصر، مطرح شده است. اکنون لازم است صحت داستان، ارزیابی و راستی‌آزمایی گردد؛ و بررسی شود: روایت‌های داستان انگیزه تألیف فصل الخطاب چگونه هستند؟ آیا اطلاعات این داستان با شواهد تاریخی دیگر و مرتبط با محدث نوری و فصل الخطاب، هماهنگ هستند؟ با بررسی تاریخی داده‌های داستان و تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات و تطبیق آنها با شرح‌حال سردار کابلی و محدث نوری و برخی دیگران با روش کتابخانه‌ای، مشخص شد که داستان انگلیسی انگیزۀ تألیف فصل‌الخطاب، نادرست می‌باشد؛ و احتمالاً با داستان کتاب مسالک المحسنین و شیخ فضل الله نوری، اشتباه شده است

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Critique of the story of the motivation for writing the book Chapter of Al-Khattab Mohaddes Nouri (with emphasis on quoting Ayatollah Mohammad Sadeghi Tehrani)

نویسنده [English]

  • Kazem Ostadi
Scholar and researcher, scholar of Qur'an and Hadith sciences, University of Qur'an and Hadith, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

It seems that the most controversial Shiite book, which considered the possibility of deletion and change in the Ottoman Mushaf correct, is the book Fasul al-Khattab by Mirza Hussein Nouri. The works written in reaction or rejection of this work, from the middle of the year of writing the book until the death of Mohaddes Nouri, are insignificant; But in the contemporary period, and especially in the last three decades, many works have dealt with the Al-Khattab chapter. In the meantime, in some of these works, there are claims and stories about Mohaddes Nouri and his book; Which has caused sharp comments and criticisms about Haji Nouri's scientific personality. One of these stories is the story of the motivation for writing Al-Khattab; It is said that Muhaddith Nouri was deceived by the British government to strike at Islam; And his chapter book was written at the instigation of a British embassy staffer or spy. This story has been narrated by Ayatollah Marashi Najafi, quoted by Sardar Kaboli, and by some of the great contemporary verses. Therefore, it is now necessary to evaluate the accuracy of the story and verify it; And be examined: 1- What are the narratives of the story of the motivation for writing the chapter of Al-Khattab? 2- What is the information and data of this story? 3- Is the information of this story consistent with other historical evidences related to Mohaddes Nouri and Fasl al-Khattab? 4- What contradictions and ambiguities can be raised about this story? The most detailed narration of the story is by Ayatollah Sadeghi Tehrani; There is various information and data in his narration; Each of them can be examined separately and finally, on top of each other. By historically examining the data of the story and analyzing the information and matching them with the biographies of Sardar Kaboli and Mohaddes Nouri and some others with the library method, it was found that the story is the motivation for writing the chapter and its information, for several reasons; Some of them are: 1- Mohaddes Nouri was not the master of Sardar Kaboli. 2- Sardar Kaboli has not participated in the courses and researches of Mohaddes Nouri. 3- At the time of writing, Sardar Kaboli was not born. 4- Categorized statistical writings cannot be presented daily. 5- At the time of Mohaddes Nouri, there were no passports or visas. 6- Sheikh Reza was not a bookseller, the lithographer of the Al-Khattab chapter. 7- After the publication of Al-Khattab, the voices of Iraqi and Iranian scholars were not heard. 8- Atabak did not do anything at the time of publishing the book of Al-Khattab chapter. 9- Mirza Shirazi agreed with the book of the chapter of speech. 10- The time and cause of Atabak's murder are inconsistent with Sadeghi's story. 11- Mohaddes Nouri has not regretted publishing and distributing the book of Al-Khattab chapter. Apart from the incorrect statements that were made; There are also ambiguities about the storytellers; Some of them are: 1- The four narrators have expressed the details of the story differently. 2- The story told by Sardar Kaboli and Marashi is the only unwritten news. 3- Early narrators, some of their archives are not accurate. Due to the inaccuracy of the story information, the motive for writing the Al-Khattab chapter seems to be that the memory of Ayatollah Marashi or Sardar Kaboli has confused the matching of the two stories or the information of the two events. This means that, for example, they may have mixed a memoir of Muhaddith Nouri with a memoir of Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri about the book Masalak al-Muhsinin Talibov, due to the commonality of Nouri and the two controversial works of al-Khattab and Masalak al-Muhsin.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shiite Bibliography
  • Shabbiri Zanjani
  • Mohammad Ali Gerami
  • Asef Mohseni
  • Quran Distortion
  • Ottoman Mushaf