کاروانسراهای ساسانی- اسلامی جنوب ایران(مطالعه موردی کاروانسرای محمدآباد کهگیلویه)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری ،گروه باستان شناسی، دانشکده مرمت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه باستان شناسی، دانشکده مرمت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

ساخت کاروانسرا و چاپارخانه یکی از مهمترین اقدامات ایرانیان در دوره تاریخی و اسلامی، برای آسایش مسافرین در مسیر راههای ارتباطی بوده است. در منطقه جنوبغربی ایران تعدادی کاروانسرا با پلان ساده( کاروانسرای دروازه گچ رامهرمز، کاروانسرای دژمهتابی کاروانسرای محمدآباد کهگیلویه، کاروانسراهای خان‌عوض گچساران و تعداد زیادی کاروانسرا در جنوب فارس در منطقه‌ی لار) دیده می‌شود که مطالعه دقیق باستان‌شناختی آنها سبب شناخت ما از سیر تحول این فرم معماری در دوره تاریخی و اسلامی خواهد شد. سوالی که در این پژوهش با آن روبرو هستیم این است که: مهمترین ویژگی کاروانسراهای ساده جنوب‌غربی ایران چیست و گاهنگاری و تداوم شکل‌گیری آنها چگونه است؟ روش این پژوهش توصیفی – تطبیقی و تاریخی- تحلیلی است و ضمن بررسی منابع تاریخی در خصوص راههای ارتباطی منطقه در دوره اسلامی و شواهد باستان‌شناختی کاروانسرای محمدآباد، به بررسی تطبیقی آن با کاروانسراهای همگون دیگر منطقه کهگیلویه، خوزستان، فارس و بنای مشابه دیگری در قصرالحیر غربی سوریه پرداخته شده است. کاروانسرای محمدآباد بر اساس منابع تاریخی همچون ایستگاههای ذکر شده مسیر تاریخی ارجان- اصفهان توسط مقدسی، مقایسه تطبیقی معماری آن با کاروانسراهای همگون و همچنین یافته‌های سفالی سطح آن به دوران ساسانی تا سلجوقی نسبت داده می‌شود. شیوه تاق‌زنی و پیمون‌های تقریبا یکسان بکار رفته در بسیاری از این کاروانسراها، از ویژگی‌های آشکار کاروانسرای محمدآباد و کاروانسراهای همگون دیگر محسوب می شود. ترکیب فضایی این کاروانسراها نشان می‌دهد که فضای طویل طولی تالار مانند آن به عنوان اصطبل و محلی برای چهارپایان و معدودی اتاق در دو سوی ورودی آن، محل استراحت مسافران بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Sassanid-Islamic Caravanserais of Southwest Iran: A Case Study (Mohammad Abad Caravanserai in Kohgiluyeh Region)

نویسندگان [English]

  • hossein sepidnameh 1
  • ahmad salehi kakhki 2
1 PhD student. Department of Archaeology, Conservation Faculty, Art University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor. Department of Archaeology, Conservation Faculty, Art University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

ding caravansaries has been one of the most important civil and welfare activities of Iranians during historical and islamic centuries. Although numerous researches have been done by former researchers, there are many untold things to clarify the changes of this form of architecture. In south of Iran (Khouzestan and Kohgiluyeh & Boyer Ahmad provinces) there are some caravansaries left from the last centuries. It is belived that the investigation of these structures helps the better understanding of changing trend of building caravansaries in Iran, especially in its southern parts. Among them, an old caravansary located in the vicinity of Mohammad Abad village, Dezhe-Mahtabi caravansary, KhanAvaz caravansary (in Kohgilouyeh & Boyer Ahmad province) , Darvazeh - Gach caravansary (located in Ramhormoz city in Khouzestan province), and many others in Lar region (Fars province) could be mentioned. The question which we are going to find its answer in this study is that: What is the most important charactristic of simple caravansaries in southwest of Iran and how has been the history and the evolution of them? The method used in this survey are descriptive-conformative and also historical-analytical approaches. While investigating historical resources about road connections in the region during islamic period and archeological evidence of Mohammad Abad caravansary, the authors have made an attempt to evaluate the similarity of this caravansary with other similar caravansaries in Kohgilouyeh & Boyer Ahmad, Khouzestan, Fars, and another similar building in western Qasr-alheir in Syria.
In terms of plan and overall map, Mohammed Abad caravanserai is comparable to “Darvazegach” caravanserai which is known as the oldest caravanserai in Iran, belonging to the Sassanid period. However, in terms of overall dimensions, Mohammed Abad caravanserai is considered as a larger sample of “Darvazegach” caravanserai. Although it is comparable to Dezhmahtabi caravanserai in the fifth century AH/10th century CE in terms of the materials used, the type of arch (crescent arch), and the pillars applied, according to the list of stations on Arjan-Semirom route mentioned by Moghaddassi (the fourth century AH/10th centuries CE; the oldest historical text about the historical route of Arjan-Isfahan), the first station from Arjan is Kenesht Majoosan. It is possible that Dezhmahtabi caravanserai is the station mentioned by Moghaddassi. Since Mohammad Abad caravanserai is the second well-known caravanserai in Kohgiluyeh, which is about 2-day travel (60 km) from Arjan, it is the same station mentioned by Moghaddassi (Gharyeh is the second station on Arjan-Isfahan route). Thus, the construction of Mohammad Abad caravanserai can be attributed to at least the fourth century AH. Although it is not possible to neglect the presence of Dehdasht 10 km east of Mohammad Abad caravanserai, which was probably called the village of Al-Dasht initially and Dehdasht in the Safavid era with a significant position in the Kuhgiluyeh region, artifacts not older than Seljuqid period have been found there. It is noteworthy that the third station on this historical route is the city of Ziz in the 4th century AH/10th century CE, Ziz and Gharyeh stations were built simultaneously. Moghaddasi stated that Ziz was a small town located along the Taab River, where meat, walnuts, and fruits were cheap, and the central mosque, which began in 367 AH/ 977 CE, was left unfinished until 368 AH/978 CE when he was still there. Mohammad Abad caravanserai is also comparable to north and south Khan Avaz caravanserais on the Arjan-Shiraz route, which are attributed to the fourth and fifth centuries AH based on the study of surface potteries. It should be noted that during the fourth and fifth centuries AH/ 10th-11th centuries CE, Kohgiluyeh was part of Fars province, which was under the rule of Al-Bouye (327-432 AH/ 938-1040 CE); therefore, it is possible to attribute the construction of this caravanserai to Al-Bouye. It is said that “Azud Al-Dawla” constructed 3,000 mosques and inns in the late 4th century AH, mostly in western parts of Iran. Al-Bouye caravanserais in this region are probably part of the network of caravanserais built based on Al-Bouye caravan program. Mohammad Abad caravanserai was used by the tribes of the region during the Pahlavi era. The parts of the caravanserai restored with rock and mortar are related to this period. In the 1990s, as the city of Mohammad Abad emerged, the ceiling and walls of the caravanserai were extensively demolished and its gypsum was used for the construction of new houses. The simple architecture of these caravansaries, which had long spaces suitable for keeping the horses of the caravans, suggests a function beyond the accommodation of travelers and is probably rooted in “Chapar Khaneh” originating from the Achaemenid period. As we know, a number of caravanserais were the means of conducting “Barid” or dispatching political-official messages, that had maintained their importance from the Achaemenid period to the Islamic middle centuries. Barid was arranged on regular intervals at intermediate stop points and by changing horses, and in addition to delivering documents and messages quickly, it was an obvious means of transferring military and civilian information (ibid: 438). Barid in the south-west communication routes in Iran was more important than other parts of Iran, because the major capitals of Iran were in Fars from the Achaemenid period to the Al-Bouye period, and the important way connecting the western centers of the Persian empire from Shusha and Ctesiphon to the center of Fars passed from Khuzestan and Kohgiluyeh. What has been reported about this way in the Islamic era is the mention of places such as Farzuk, Bandak, Hebs, Khan Hammad, Jonbaz or Gonbad Molghan. Therefore, it is not beyond expectations that the form of these caravansaries would be the continuation of pre-Islamic monuments for Chapar Khanes which had the task of informing and conveying governmental documents to various parts of the empire. However, what does this form in the Western Qasr Al-Hayr collection indicate? As historical sources show, with the establishment of the Umayyad system in the middle of the first century AH and the reversal of the Islamic government towards the royal government and the proclamation of Muawiyah as the first king of the Arabs, he established Barid by consulting his Persian and Roman advisors in order to fulfill his goals in the administrative system of the government. He aimed to set up the Supreme Court to speed up the collection of news and information in the areas under management, secure the roads and counterespionage operations, repel the evil of bandits, care for and repair roads, bring Khalifa’s secret news to senior officials, and provide regular reports on financial, military, and civilian affairs and its dissemination. At the Umayyad era, Barid expenditure was forty million Dirhams, which is twice the amount spent by the next dynasty, the Abbasids. Koureh Arjan and Kohgilouyeh region, in the course of the Achaemenid and Sassanid dynasties, linked Asia Minor through Mesopotamia to Susa, Arjan, and Estakhr. The Silk Road also passed Baghdad, Halwan, and Nasibain and reached, after crossing the Euphrates, the city of Hierapolis and the port of Antioch on the Mediterranean coast. In the Islamic period, this region maintained its communication position through which the economic relationship of Fars was established with the centers of the Islamic caliphate in the Chamat in the Umayyad period (Syria and Jordan) and Iraq during the Abbasid period (Basra, Baghdad, and Al-Vaset), and an important commercial route passed from this region to Isfahan. Therefore, it is not beyond expectations to notice the formation and construction of this type of caravanserais in Syria during the Umayyad period.
In this study, Mohammad Abad caravansary was investigated by using historical resources and archeological evidence and it has been illustrated that this caravansary and other similar caravansaries are dating back to Sasanid to Al-Booyeh era. The building lack any castle in corners, but the remained evidence suggests a guarding room on the top of their entrance. Curved roofs and similar dimensions of them are two others main charactristics of these buildings. The similar appearance of these caravansaries implies the existence of a coherent plan from road building authorities of Sasanid to Saljuqi period. If these structures are put in the texture of the regions which are under investigation, considering the fact that Darvazeh-Gach is attributed to Sasanid period, it would be probable that with the formation if Arjan city and its importance in the south of Iran, constructing caravansaries has been one of the most necessities of communication with other regions in Iran and with the five regions. And it should be mentioned that historians have noticed the importance of Arjan area in Al-Booyeh period. Transformation of the wealth acquired from agriculture and trade in this region, had resulted in paying attention to roads in Arjan region and to the construction of public facilities like caravansaries and numerous bridges which is recognized better by doing archeological investigations. Anyway, archeological evidence show that this caravansary has been built in Sasanid and Al-Booyeh periods. However, considering the fact that there has been no archeological study about the beneath parts of the building and probable adjoints, these kinds of studies seem necessary to investigate revolutionary trend of caravansaries located in south of Iran in details. These studies are also having a pivotal role in understanding questions about the reasons why these caravansaries are small and the reasons for not observing security principles in building them. In late islamic period, in which constructing caravansaries was very common, many of them has been built in Lar region in Fars province and demonstrates the continuation of this form of architecture in this period. Yet, these caravansaries are not like what researchers described them as four-porches buildings, and they lack any kind of Porch. The only porch in them might be their entrance part. The practical aspects of these building as stables in three sides of them, compared to low attention paid to providing rooms for passengers, make researchers to remember Chapar houses which were built in islamic period, specifically the early centuries, in accordance with Achaemenid innovations. Hence, the roads on which these buildings have been established (roads like Khouzestan to Fars), have had a great importance in Achaemenid to Sasanid period.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Caravanserai
  • Architecture
  • Archaeology
  • Kohgiluyeh
  • Southwest of Iran
ابن­بلخی (1374)، فارسنامه ابن بلخی، توضیح و تحشیة از منصور رستگار فسایی، شیراز: بنیاد فارس شناسی.
ابن حوقل (1345)، صوره الارض، ترجمة جعفر شعار، تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
ابن خردادبه (1370)، المسالک و الممالک، ترجمة حسین قره­چانلو، تهران: چاپخانه مهارت.
ابن­رسته (1365)، الاعلاق النفیسه، ترجمه و تعلیق حسین قره­چانلو، تهران: امیرکبیر.
آزاد، میترا (1381)، معماری ایران در قلمرو آل بویه، تهران: کلیدر.
آزادی، احمد و ابراهیم قزلباش (1390)، معرفی مکانهای نویافته دوره نوسنگی در منطقه کهگیلویه، مجله باستان شناسی و تاریخ، شمارة 48، صص 16 -3.
آزادی، احمد (1386)، بررسی باستان شناختی منطقه لیکک بهمئی کهگیلویه، نامة پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی، شمارة 20 و 21.
برند، باربارا (1383)، هنر اسلامی، ترجمة مهناز شایسته­فر، تهران: انتشارات موسسه مطالعات هنر اسلامی.
پیرنیا، حسن (1385)، تاریخ ایران از آغاز تا انقراض ساسانیان، تهران: انتشارات میلاد.
پیرنیا، محمدکریم و کرامت­الله افسر (بی تا)، راه و رباط، تهران: انتشارات سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی.
حسینی­منشی، محمدمیرک (1385) ریاض الفردوس خانی، به کوشش ایرج افشار و فرشته صرافان، تهران: بنیاد موقوفات محمود افشار.
حقیقت، عبدالرفیع (1387)، حکومت جهانی ایرانیان از کورش تا آریوبرزن. تهران: کومش.
دوبد، بارون (1371)، سفرنامه لرستان و خوزستان، ترجمة محمدحسین آریا، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
رجبی، نوروز (1394)، یافته­های باستان­شناسی فصل دوم کاوش محوطة مادآباد الف­ـ مرودشت، مجلة پژوهش­های باستان­شنلسی ایران، شمارة 9، صص 175-194.
زیدان، جُرجی (1372)، تاریخ تمدن اسلام، ترجمة علی جواهرکلام، تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
سپهری، محمد (1391)، تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی، تهران: انتشارات شورای برنامه­ریزی مدارس علوم دینی اهل سنت.
سپیدنامه، حسین و احمد صالحی کاخکی (1395)، زیستگاههای کوچ­نشینی کهگیلویه در دوران اسلامی (مطالعه موردی محوطه دلی یاسیر)، مجلة پژوهش­های انسان­شناسی ایران.
سپیدنامه، حسین (1390)،  شناسایی راههای اصلی ارتباطی کهگیلویه ­ وبویراحمد با استانهای همجوار از قرن پنجم هـ .ق تا پایان دوره قاجار ( براساس بررسی و مطالعه پل­ها و کاروانسراهاپایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشتة باستان­شناسی دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
سیرو، ماکسیم (1949). کاروانسراهای ایران و ساختمانهای کوچک میان راهها، ترجمة عیسی بهنام، تهران: سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی ایران.
کریمی، بهمن (1329). راههای باستانی پایتخت­های قدیمی غرب ایران، تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر ملی.
کیانی، محمدیوسف و کلایس، ولفرام (1362). فهرست کاروانسراهای ایران، جلد اول. تهران: سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی.
کیانی، محمدیوسف، ولفرام کلایس (1368)، فهرست کاروانسراهای ایران، جلد دوم. تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
گاوبه، هاینس (1359)،  ارجان و کهگیلویه از فتح عرب تا پایان دوره صفوی، ترجمة سعید فرهودی، تهران:  انجمن آثار ملی.
ثواقب، جهانبخش (1396). «کارکرد سیاسی­ـ ­امنیتی دیوان برید در خلافت اسلامی»، تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی. شماره 26، صص116-91.
لایارد، اوستن هنری (1367)، سفرنامه لایارد، ترجمة مهراب امیری، تهران: انتشارات وحید.
محمدی ملایری، محمد (1374)، فرهنگ ایرانی پیش از اسلام و آثار آن در تمدن اسلامی و ادبیات عربی، تهران: توس.
مستوفی، حمدالله (1336)، نزهه القلوب، به کوشش محمد دبیرسیاقی، تهران: کتابخانه طهوری.
مقدسی، ابوعبدالله محمد (1361)،  احسن التقاسیم فی معرفه الاقالیم، ترجمة علینقی منزوی، تهران: شرکت مولفان و مترجمان ایران.
ناصر خسرو (1344)، سفرنامه ناصرخسرو، به کوشش محمد دبیرسیاقی، تهران: کتابخانه طهوری.
هیلن براند، رابرت (1386)، معماری اسلامی: فرم، عملکرد و معنی، ترجمة ایرج اعتصام، تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه­ریزی شهری.
یغمایی، احسان(1385)، «چند منزلگاه راه شاهی هخامنشی: از نورآباد ممسنی تا ارجان بهبهان»، مجلة باستان­پژوهی. شمارة 2، صص 48-32.
یغمایی، احسان (1373)، «تنگ تکاب بهبهان و کاروان­سرای دژ مهتابی»، مجلة میراث فرهنگی، شمارة12، صص 236-244.
یغمایی، احسان (1384)، «جغرافیای تاریخی و پیشینه باستان­شناسی ارجان»، نامه پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی. شماره پیاپی 11.
KLEISS, WOLFRAM. KARAWANENBAUTEN IN IRAN. TELL ΙΙΙ, 1996
Stein, Aurel, Old Routes of western Iran. London. MacMillan, 1940
SUMNER, William and Donald WHITCOMB, 1999, “ISLAMIC SETTLEMENT AND CHRONOLOGY IN FARS: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE”. Iranica Antiqua, vol .XXXIV, PP. 310 – 324.
www,archnet.com